Rafidah Didn't Show Any Support To Imam Musa Al Kazim (as)

In this clip the 12er Shia scholar covers the history about how the Rafidah were useless Shias, who failed to do anything for the Imams, but when the Imams passed away they were always in the front lines mourning and crying.

Nakshawani Blames Ahle Sunnah for ISIS

So if this how he judges ahle sunnah what was the point of reprimanding Yassir Habib ?

Yasser Habib Discourages Taqiyyah in Debates

The 12er Shia Imams  in the 12er Shia books are the Imams of hate. Therefore, Yasser al Habib attributed a hadith to the Prophet (pbuh) where he supposedly hit Ayesha. He was even corrected by the 12ers, yet he refused to accept the correct view. The man is waiting for the 12th Imam to come and resurrect Ayesha and take revenge. So he refused to be corrected.

Aside from that full respect goes to this man for encouraging dozners to speak the truth openly. I've come across his type of 12ers, and we actually got along very well. Whereas the deceptive taqiyyah based 12ers have angered and frustrated me with their lies and deception. Yes, 12ers your taqiyyah is dangerous and I do find it a threat. Ibn Al Alqami even allowed Iraq to be destroyed with this treacherous behavior.   This attack included Imam Ali's (as) shrine to damaged.

The Result of Waiting for the Mahdi

Dozener's 9th Imam Uses Qiyas to Explain the Punishment of Theft

The 12ers claim Imam Jafar (as) cursed Imam Abu Hanifa (ra) for using Qiyas in fiqh. We can agree with them that the Imam condemned Qiyas, but to curse is the method of the Khawarij. The sahaba had differing views on fiqh, and they differed many times in front of the Prophet(pbuh). The Prophet (pbuh) did not curse them.
Anyway, as much the 12ers shias curse Abu Hanifa, they are in taqiyyah mode when it comes to self criticism.
For example, during Muharram chest beating isn't considered a Sunnah, yet they use Qiyas to justify why they do it.

Another interesting incident I found is that to justify the punishment of theft they attribute Qiyas toward the 9th Imam in order for him to explain his position.

One day a person came to the court of Mu‘tasim and confessed that he had committed theft and would like to be punished so that he could be free from the guilt and punishment in the hereafter. The Qur’an says that the punishment for theft (with some conditions) is cutting off the thief’s yad. Yad means: hand, forearm and elbow. So the caliph called all the prominent religious scholars, including Imam Muhammad at-Taqi (a.s.), and asked: “From where should the yad of the thief be cut?” (The Qur’an is asking for the definition of “yad”.)
Ibn Abi Da’ud, the chief judge, said, “From the wrist.”
Mu‘tasim: “What is your proof for that?”
Ibn Abi Da’ud: “The word ‘yad’ has been used in the verse of tayammum —so wipe your faces and your hands(5:5)— for the hand.”
Some scholars agreed with Ibn Abi Da’ud but others disagreed and said: “Cut the thief’s yad from the elbow.”
Mu‘tasim: “What is your proof?”
The scholars: “The word ‘yad’ has been used in the verse of wudhu —wash your faces and your hands up to the elbows (5:5)— for the fore-arm.”
Then Mu‘tasim turned towards Imam Muhammad at-Taqi (a.s.) and asked his opinion. The Imam first declined to give his view because he was aware of the court’s politics. But when Mu‘tasim insisted, the Imam finally said, “All these gentlemen are mistaken because only the [four] fingers have to be cut.”
Mu‘tasim: “What is your proof?”
The Imam (a.s.): “The Prophet (s.a.w.) has said that sajdah is done on seven parts of the body: forehead, palms, knees and two big toes [of the feet]. If a thief’s hand or forearm is cut, then it would not be possible for him to do the sajdah whereas Allâh has said, ‘And verily the masâjid [the body parts on which sajdah is done] belong to Allâh...;’ and what belongs to Allâh should not be cut.”
The caliph liked the answer of the Imam and ordered that the four fingers of the thief be cut.
This extraordinary event, in the public’s view at Mu‘tasim’s court, proved the superiority of the Imams of Ahlu ’l-Bayt. It, however, also created an extreme feeling of jealousy and hatred in the heart of Ibn Abi Da’ud.
On finding an appropriate moment, Ibn Abi Da’ud cautioned the caliph against inadvertantly promoting Imam Muhammad at-Taqi (a.s.) by publicly following his view and rejecting those of the other scholars. He filled the caliph’s ears to the extent that the caliph started looking at the Imam as a threat to his own caliphate.
During the last days of Dhul Qa‘dah 220 A.H., the Imam was poisoned by his wife, the niece of Mu‘tasim, and he died as a martyr. His body was buried next to his grandfather’s grave in the Qurayshi cemetary in Baghdad which is now known as Kâdhimayn.

http://www.imamreza.net/eng/imamreza.php?id=7711

So first the Imam does taqiyyah, then he uses anology to explain his view

12ers and Yahood Share a Similar History

I am using this interview as a reference to compare the historical similarities.

Start listening from the 12:00 min mark.Then at 13:55  min point he discusses history which goes parallel with the history of the Rafidah/12er Shia. All you would have to do is replace the term Yahud with Rafidah and 2000 with 1300.

Who are the Ahlul Bayt ?

Here is a Q & A from the 12er Shia.

Another contributor commented that if based on Sunni
references we quoted, Ahlul-Bayt are the Prophet,
Fatimah, Ali, al-Hasan and al-Husain, then how can you include the nine descendants of alHusain(as)?


As we have already pointed out, only five members
of Ahlul-Bayt were alive at the time of the
Prophet(pbuh&hf). They were Prophet Muhammad, Lady
Fatimah, Imam Ali, Imam al-Hasan, and Imam al-
Husain. They were mentioned as Ahlul-Bayt by the Prophet(pbuh&hf) and the most important Sunni
collections testify to this fact.
However the nine descendants of Imam al-Husain were no
t alive at that time so that the Prophet could not
cover them by his mantle! But the Prophet did, in fact, mention their names and their numbers. Let us
review some traditions from Sihah Sittah:

First of all there is no such thing as Sihah Sittah. The Sunnis only  have 2 Sahih collection of ahadith books, and the remaining books are referred to as Sunan books. Secondly, the Sunnis do believe that the 9 descendants of Imam Hussain (as) who the 12er shia number 4-12 are part of Ahlul Bayt and purified, but not to the same degree as the Holy Five. Thirdly to state that since the other imams were not alive therefore only 4 were chosen for this verse of purification is  a baseless statement. If the other Imams were to equally purified then the Prophet (pbuh) would have stated there will be 9 others who are included in this verse. Remember Zaineb (sa) was alive during the lifetime of the Prophet (pbuh) and she is also part of Ahlul Bayt (as).  On the contrary, the 12er Shia do not consider her to be infallible.
Purification does not mean infallible. If a pious Muslim does not sin it doesn't make him infallible. In history, Imam Ali (as) had to rethink his decisions, and there are many 12ers who are misguided to believe that whatever Imam Ali (as) willed is what Allah (swt) wills. This is a very deviant way of thinking. Examples of this would be when Imam Ali (as) appointed Ziyad as a govern of Basra. Another would be when the Imam had to replace Malik al Asthar (ra) with Muhammad bin Abi Bakr (ra) in Egypt. If he was infallible then he wouldn't need to rethink these decisions. Therefore, the Sunnis believe is that only the Prophets (as) are infallible since they bring guidance through wahi. Next the 12er Shia quote the 12 Calipahs ahadith. The reality of this ahadith is its a Ummavi fabrication to make the ummah believe that for all centuries of Islam there are only  12 destined rulers. On top of that they made themselves the 12 Calipahs, so Muslims would believe there can't be any other rulers. Likewise, the 12er did the same with their beliefs on the 12 Imams. However, in history we don't have a single narration where the Imams numbered themselves one to twelve. Also, these 12 imams never used this 12 calipah ahadith to convince other that they are the 12 divinely appointed imams.

Next the 12er use the ahadith that a Jewish man came and asked who the 12 Imams are. There is no reference in the bible about 12 Imams. The 12 princes in the bible are not the 12 Imams. I already covered that in another blog. Next if the 12 Imams were mentioned in the bible then why couldn't they be mentioned in the Quran ? Again the 12er shia reasoning is mostly based on analogies and extrapolations, and these method of understanding are not binding on the ummah. In fact, as I know the Ahlul Bayt rejected the concept of analogies and extrapolations. They were strictly textual imams. So in the end, if Ahlul Bayt extends to the 9 descendants of Imam Hussain (as) then it also extends to the other children of Imam Hassan (as) and Imam Hussain (as). Eventually through generation the purification level starts dropping based on the level of deviance from the truth.