The Signs of Nasabis Who Are Hidden Among the Sunnis

Syed Ninowy exposes the Nisabis that are found among the Sunnis. The Nawasib are so corrupt that they try to inject their blasphemous views toward the Sunni Madhab. How do they do this?
They do this by giving us shaytaini inspirations. They tell the average Sunni to:

• Prevent naming their children Ali, Hassan or Hussain
• Not name their mosques after Imam Ali (as)
• Not talk about Imam Ali (as) seerah or gives his examples
• Not wear black cause that is a color which is restricted to the people of the shia sect
• Not mention the merits of Imam Ali (as)

On top of that the Nisabis deny the merits of Imam Ali (as) which are graded as sahih.

The Nawasib in reality are not Sunnis. The reason is Sunnis believe in Imam Ali (as) as a guide and acknowledge his merits.

Syed Ninowy also points out the Nisabi leaning of Ibn Taymiya.

Ibn Tamiyah states

ابن تيمية في منهاج في الجزء الثالث في ص175



فإن عليا قاتل على الولاية وقتل بسبب ذلك خلق كثير عظيم ، ولم يحصل في ولايته لا قتال للكفار ولا فتح لبلادهم ، ولا كان المسلمون في زيادة خير



Ibn Taymiya says : Ali fought for politics and because of this scores were killed and nothing good happened in his rule, no war with kuffar, no gain of other lands and for moslims there was no 'khair' Good (in his reign) for Muslims (Minhaj as Sunnah)

This paragraph has a few things that Ibn Taymiya is saying:

1- That Imam Ali fought his wars for the sake of the chair, not for Islam, contrary to the multiple hadiths by the Prophet, sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam himself.

2- He blames Sayydina Ali for the death of the people who died in the battles. Which means: if we use Ibn Taymiya's logic: the Prophet, sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam, is to blame for the killing of Sayidina Hamza!!!! and all the Shuhada of the companions (ra).

3-That in the Khilafa os Sayyidina Ali, no fighting of the Kuffar took place.
Remember a minute ago, he blamed sayyidina Ali for the people who fought for the Haqq, now he turns around and says why didn't you fight.

4- That in the Khilafa of Sayyidina Ali, no concurring of other lands happened.
Well, the Prophet, sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam, himself, stayed in macca 13 years spreading and teaching Islam, and not only didn't concur lands, he lost his home and land, and the Sahaba lost their homes and lands...

The Prophet, sallallahu alayhi wa aalihi wa sallam, however, and Sayyidina Ali did concur the hearts of the those who love the Haqq, were on the Haqq, and supported the Haqq.

5- That during the Khilafa of Sayyidina Ali, Muslims did not increase in Khayr (goodness and prosperity).
What more Khayr do you want than to be able to look at the honorable face of Ali bin Abi Taleb. A look that is considered Ibada, an act of worship by itself!!!!!!
The Hadith is " looking at the face of Ali is ibadah", and Shaykh Ninowy said it was Saheeh, and its narrated in Musnad Ahmad.




Another narration by Ibn Taymiyya showing his flagrant Nasibi/yazidi ideology by negating the bounties (fazael) of Sayyidina Ali:

Ibn Taymiyya says in the "Minhaaj of "his" Sunnah" Vol.4/ page 86:
( the hadith that : {whosoever I am his Mawla, Ali is his mawla} is not in the authenic references, but it is the sayings of some scholars, and people disagreed in its authenticity).

Al-Albani (another salafi) refutes Ibn Tamiyah:
Al-Albani said in "his" (silsilah Saheehah) vol. 4 page 344, and vol. 5 page263-264 ( What is odd that shaykhul Islam ibn Taymiyya dares to deny this Hadith, and he rejected it in "minhaj as Sunnah"., and I don't really know the reason for such a denial to this Hadith (saheeh), except rushing and exxagerative refutation against the Shia).

Refuting Albani, Zakir Naik and the Nasabis

Here is a sahih hadith which expose Ummavi Government, which came to power after the Khulufa Rasid.

Volume 4, Book 56, Number 802:

Narrated Said Al-Umawi:

I was with Marwan and Abu Huraira and heard Abu Huraira saying, "I heard the trustworthy, truly inspired one (i.e. the Prophet ) saying, 'The destruction of my followers will be brought about by the hands of some youngsters from Quraish." Marwan asked, "Youngsters?" Abu Huraira said, "If you wish, I would name them: They are the children of so-and-so and the children of so-and-so." (al Bukhari)

This hadith openly refuted both Albani, Zakir Naik and the nawasib who believed that Yazid's rule shouldn't have been challeged.

The Nawasib of Today

Shaykh Albani of Saudi Arabia has declared Imam Hussain (as) as a sinner for revolting against the cursed Yazid. I always believed 12r shias were a big threat to Ahle Sunnah. However, I was wrong. The Nawasib of today call themselves Sunnis, and they have deviated many other Sunnis Muslims to thier extreme sect. Here the Saudi Grand Mufti has openly attacked Imam Hussain (as). This is only one form of Nisbism. Nowadays, when I enter most of the Sunnis mosques they consider Imam Hussain's (as) decisions in Karabala to irrelevant to Islam. Nauzbillah ! What is going on ?

Another form of Nisbism is the one that Zakir Naik took against Imam Hussain (as). I always thought Zakir Naik was alone when he said Imam Hussain (as) decision was a political one and not a religious one. On the contrary, I've seen many so called Sunni Mosques supporting this view. What is going on Sunnis ? Have we forgotten the Prophet's (sawas) beloved grandson. Do we really need shias to explain to us what common sense is ?

Below is Zakir Naik's Clip where he defends his deviant position.

Extreme Love and Hate Toward Imam Ali (as)

A group of people came to Imam Ali (as) and told him that he is a God. Nauzbillah! Imam Ali (as) told this extreme group that they were committing shirk with this belief, and that they had one day to repent and become Muslims again. However, the next day these extreme lovers refused to change their minds and kept their opinion. As a result, Imam Ali (as) decided to burn them after issuing many warnings.

Another Group of Extreme of Lovers said Jibrael Ameen made a mistake by giving the message to the Prophet (sawas) instead of Imam Ali (as). This belief was another form of shirk.

Both these extreme groups were not Muslims. They called themselves shias but they were kaffir in reality. Now just because these extremists existed and called themselves shias that doesn't mean all shias have the same belief or that all shias are kaffir. The extreme among the shias were a very small minority and they do not represent the majority of Muslims or even shias. They majority of the shia sects that exist today are categorized as Al Zaydia, Itna Asharee and Ismailiyah. These shias sects do not hold such blasphemous beliefs which are mentioned above.

Nisaabi

Now let us focus on the other side of extremist. This side isn't hardly discussed in our society. They are known as al Nawasib. Nawasib are those who hate or dislike Imam Ali (as). The Prophet (sawas) warned us against this other form of extremist as well. According to a sahih hadith in found Imam Nasai Sunan Imam Ali (as) narrated "In truth the Prophet has made a covenant with me saying: ‘None loves you except a believer, and none hates you except a hypocrite." Abu Sa`id al-Khudri subsequently said: "In truth we recognized the hypocrites by their hatred for `Ali." Jabir said: "We did not know the hypocrites of this Community except by their hatred for `Ali." (Sunan An-Nasai)